[Mesorah] Articulation Question

[D&E-H Bannett]

Re:  <<Near the end of David's post (3rd paragraph from the 
end), there is a
statement that Breuer does not have a meteg.  In my copy 
(4th printing,
5754) there is a meteg under the yud in yachla in Bereishit 
34:7>>

Who me?  Why would I say that?  So, I did.  In the last 
paragraph  also stated that I write without thinking first. 
Thanks for the correction.  Breuer has the meteg and 
Cohen-Keter does not.  Breuer, knowingly, does not follow 
the Keter 100% and has some metagim that are not in the 
Keter.  Cohen is convinced that his reconstruction of the 
missing parts is following the Keter correctly.  He omits 
the meteg.

Sorry for the error.  But I'm thrilled that somebody read my 
posting so carefully that he noticed.  So maybe I'm not so 
sorry about the error.


David