[Avodah] RSRH on Kedusha
Micha Berger
micha at aishdas.org
Thu Apr 22 08:06:11 PDT 2010
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 06:46:14PM -0400, Yitzchok Levine quoted RSRH's
Chumash (Vayiqra 19:2):
: The mitzvah of Kedoshim Teyu is a command to strive for the highest
: degree of human moral perfection (cf. Commentary, Bereshis 2:3); and
: rightfully it should be addressed expressly to each individual...
: Kedusha to be ready and willing to perform all that is good; a person
: cannot attain this virtue unless his whole being is so steeped in morality
: that the opposite of the good, viz., the inclination to evil, no longer
: has a place within his being....
: Kedoshim Teyu means Perushim Teyu underscores this negative
: aspect of Kedusha. It also points out the way that leads to Kedusha...
However, the preposition used WRT qedushah is "le-". "Me-" is used with
taharah. (Tum'ah can be "me-" or "be-" -- a person can be tamei from
something, or even ch"v internalize the tum'ah.)
So the way I analyzed things, I concluded that both taharah and qedushah
are subtypes of havdalah. Taharah is havdalah from something negative;
RSRH says it's the illusion that we're merely physical beings who can not
rebell against our physical natures. Qedushah, I saw also as a separation
(perushim tihyu) but the focus is not what one is set away from, but
what one is separated for (le-) and commited to. (And that definition
works for "harei at mequdeshes li..." as well as even the pagan temple
prostitute, the qedeishah.)
RSShkop defines qedushah as commitment to Hashem's goal. And what is
that goal? Since it is impossible He needed to get anything out of
creation, clearly creation must be for our sake. Qedushah is therefore
the total commitment to a life of doing things for others.
Here's my translation of the relevent part of his haqdamah:
In my opinion, this whole concept is included in Hashem's mitzvah
"Be holy, [for I am Holy]." The Midrash (Leviticus, Emor, ch. 24)
says about this verse: "Can it [truly] be 'Like Me?' This is why
it continues, 'for I am Holy' to teach that My Sanctity is above
yours." And about the foundation of this mitzvah of sanctity
the Toras Kohanim has "'be holy' -- be separate". Nachmanides,
in his commentary on the Torah, explains at length this notion of
separation as it is stated in this mitzvah, that it is separation
from excessive comfort and pleasure -- even if they are actions that
are not prohibited to us. In one illustrative statement, he writes
that it is possible for a person to be disgusting with [what would
otherwise be] the permission of the Torah, see his holy words there.
According to this, it would seem the Midrash is incomprehensible.
What relevance does the concept of separation have to being similar
to the Holy? The verse tells us with regard to this that His Will
is not like this. As it says, "Can it [truly] be 'Like Me?' This
is why it continues, 'For I am holy' to teach that My sanctity is
above Yours." This explanation is incumbent upon us to understand;
in truth there is some similarity in the holiness He expects of us
to His [Sanctity], except that His Holiness is more general and
inclusive. If we say that the essential idea of the holiness He
demands of us (in this mitzvah of "be holy") is distance from the
permissible, this kind of holiness has nothing to do with Him.
And so, it appears to my limited thought that this mitzvah includes
the entire foundation and root of the purpose of our lives. All
of our work and effort should constantly be sanctified to doing
good for the community. We should not use any act, movement, or
get benefit or enjoyment that doesn't have in it some element of
helping another. And as understood, all holiness is being set apart
for an honorable purpose -- which is that a person straightens his
path and strives constantly to make his lifestyle dedicated to the
community. Then, anything he does even for himself, for the health of
his body and soul he also associates to the mitzvah of being holy,
for through this he can also do good for the masses. Through the
good he does for himself he can do good for the many who rely on
him. But if he derives benefit from some kind of permissible thing
that isn't needed for the health of his body and soul, that benefit
is in opposition to holiness. For in this he is benefiting himself
(for that moment as it seems to him), but no one else.
In this way, the concept of separation is an aspect of the underlying
basis of the mitzvah of holiness, which is recognizable in practice
in the ways a person acts. But with insight and the calling of
spirituality this mitzvah broadens to include everything a person
causes or does even between him and the Omnipresent. In relation to
this, this holiness is comparable to the Holiness of the Creator
in whatever little similarity. Just as the Act of the Holy One in
all of creation, and in each and every moment that He continues to
cause the universe to exist, all His actions are sanctified to the
good of others, so too it is His Will that our actions be constantly
sanctified to the good of the community, and not personal benefit.
HOWEVER, what of a person who decides to submerge his nature,
to reach a high level so that he has no thought or inclination in
his soul for his own good, only a desire for the good of others? In
this way he would have his desire reach the sanctity of the Creator,
as His Desire in all of the creation and management of the world
is only for the good of the created, and not for Himself at all. At
first glance one might say that if a person reached this level, he
would reach the epitome of being whole. But this is why our Sages
of blessed memory teach us in this Midrash that it is not so....
Tir'u baTov!
-Micha
--
Micha Berger Today is the 23rd day, which is
micha at aishdas.org 3 weeks and 2 days in/toward the omer.
http://www.aishdas.org Gevurah sheb'Netzach: How does my domination
Fax: (270) 514-1507 stifle others?
More information about the Avodah
mailing list