[Avodah] running a seder
Daniel Israel
dmi1 at hushmail.com
Tue Apr 7 14:59:35 PDT 2009
On Tue, 07 Apr 2009 14:38:35 -0600 rabbirichwolpoe at gmail.com wrote:
>Daniel:
>>In any case, we can't take the four questions as real questions
of
>>the child because there is a set text. So they are, in a sense,
>>symbolic.
>
>But the points are
>They are real
>And they are NOT questions at al!l rather they are a table of
>contents of coming attractions!
>
>May I humbly suggest reading the sources quoted before jumping to
>any conclusions;
>Viz. Goldscmidt haggada
>Aruch Hashulchan
>Rambam's seder with any good peirush
>Mishna arvei pesachim preferably with artscroll.
>
>Afaik NO rishon sees these as questions from the children.
I'm happy to check the sources you mention, but I don't have access
Goldschmidt's haggadah, which seems to be your primary source. But
in any case, WADR, I think you missed my point. You cut my
objection to your suggestion (or is it Goldschmidt's suggestion)
that all the achronim misunderstood a Gemara, which was my real
point. Once we get beyond that, I think we agree that we can't
understand these as real questions from the children, so what are
they? I'm not sure that what you are saying and what I am saying
are that different. (But I'm not sure, because without looking at
your sources, I'm not 100% clear what you are saying.)
When you say no rishon sees these as questions from the children,
do you mean that no rishon thinks the nusach should be recited by a
child, or no rishon sees these as actual questions of the child?
Because, clearly, scripted questions are not real questions, so I
assume all the achronim also understood that even if the questions
are put into the mouth of a child, one still has to answer why the
haggadah scripts some questions, and particularly questions which
raise so many questions.
--
Daniel M. Israel
dmi1 at cornell.edu
More information about the Avodah
mailing list