[Avodah] Mitzvos Tzreichos Kavvanah

[rabbirichwolpoe at gmail.com]

See mishna Megila 2:1

It seems that the longstanding machloqes need not apply here

The cases that the mishna requires kavvanah are (e.g.) Maggiah etc.
When it is not patently obvious that one is reading lesheim mitzvah.
It THOSE ambiguous cases positive kavvanah is required

OTOH when one is reading megillah on purim no specific kavvanah is needed
because it is patently obvious that it is lesheim mitzvah

This hilluq seems to me patently obvious. :-) Does anyone else say
it already?

KT
RRW
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile