[Avodah] The Kiddushin "raid" in Lakewood
David Riceman
driceman at att.net
Tue Feb 26 10:55:35 PST 2008
Zev Sero wrote:
> Why not say that since the two rings were obviously similar enough that
> they could be easily confused, and are probably of exactly the same
> value, when he accepted his sister's ring as a return of his pikadon
> he absolved her of any further duties as a shomeret, and effectively
> swapped his ring for hers? His ring became her property, the ring she
> gave him became his property and is now his wife's, and if the sister
> and wife each want their "own" rings that's entirely a matter between
> them. Any reason we couldn't say this?
>
Transferring property requires intention (AhS HM 189:2). If I
understand the original story correctly no one noticed the switch until
after kiddushin, hence there was no intention to transfer property.
David Riceman
More information about the Avodah
mailing list